XESOFT FIELD NOTES // 2026

Review contracts for
Unity production
workflows.

Practical, primary-source-backed checklists for deciding what a CI review can observe, how to make the evidence comparable, and where the claim must stop.

FD-0101
Build engineers, technical directors, performance owners

Unity build-delta review

A repeatable way to compare a candidate Unity build with an accepted baseline and turn package growth into traceable review evidence.

Read the field guide
FD-0202
Lead engineers, tools engineers, technical artists

Unity project integrity in PRs

A conservative checklist for catching meta/GUID, serialized-reference, LFS, and package-state damage before a Unity branch lands.

Read the field guide
FD-0303
Release engineers, mobile leads, technical producers

Mobile release-artifact diff

A package-first checklist for reviewing store-facing contract and payload changes between accepted and candidate mobile releases.

Read the field guide
FD-0404
Build engineers, tools engineers, engineering leads

Unity CI failure triage

A deterministic workflow for separating shared log noise from the first materially divergent failure chain and choosing one bounded next check.

Read the field guide
FD-0505
Tools engineers, technical directors, developer-productivity owners

Unity editor iteration regression review

A controlled checklist for comparing compile, assembly-reload, asset-import, and enter-play timings without turning environment noise into a regression verdict.

Read the field guide
THE METHOD

Comparable input.
Traceable evidence.
Explicit unknown.

These guides define evaluation surfaces for XeSoft's private-pilot proposals. They are published to make the reasoning inspectable—not to imply a deployed product, customer result, or automatic diagnosis.