Mobile Release Auditor compares Android and iOS release candidates at the package level, exposing permission, entitlement, SDK, architecture, metadata, symbol, and size changes before submission day.
Only policy-relevant changes are raised.
A release-candidate diff that separates expected configuration changes from the SDK or packaging surprises most likely to delay review.
The first pilot uses the subset that matches your workflow. The rest stay out of the way until they earn their place.
Show additions, removals, and policy-sensitive changes with their originating package context.
Diff embedded frameworks, libraries, Maven dependencies, and identifiable versions.
Verify expected ABIs and slices, and flag accidental simulator or unsupported architecture content.
Compare identifiers, versions, URL schemes, minimum OS, capabilities, and manifest values.
Check expected symbol artifacts and surface stripping or debug-content changes where inspectable.
Break down package growth by the native, managed, asset, and resource sections the format exposes.
The first pilot is an evaluation contract, not an open-ended integration. The evaluator decides whether one real workflow became clearer or faster.
Release engineer, mobile lead, technical producer, or engineering lead.
One same-format candidate/baseline pair from the existing release pipeline, with expected high-level changes noted where known.
A traceable diff of store-facing contract and payload changes, with policy status, package evidence, confidence, and inspection limits.
The release owner finds an unexpected contract change or confirms the candidate faster than with the current process.
Once the contract above is confirmed, the first report is prepared within one week. No platform migration and no quarter-long rollout.
Name the evaluator, review point, safe input, exact output, transfer method, and success criterion.
Run a read-only analysis step in the current workflow or against the agreed sanitized sample, then produce the first report.
Run it against representative changes, tune noise, and decide whether the next scope is justified.
No. It inspects produced packages before submission. Store delivery remains in your current release pipeline, so the auditor never needs store credentials.
Only where the package contains reliable version evidence. Unknown or heuristic identifications are labeled as such instead of being turned into confident claims.
A first candidate-versus-baseline report for either Android or iOS, using packages from your existing pipeline and the checks most relevant to your release process.
A package-first checklist for reviewing store-facing contract and payload changes between accepted and candidate mobile releases.
Read the workflow checklist ↗Describe the recurring production problem and the smallest representative input you could evaluate. XeSoft will first confirm whether this narrow pilot is a fit—and say so plainly if it is not.
Prefer email? outreach@xesoft.dev
We will tell you what a useful one-week pilot can cover—and what it cannot.
Request a private pilot ↑